Second, in the primary research, subgroups known from the pilot research have been rated to your enthusiasm and competence

Materials and techniques

To research stereotypes out-of subgroups of females and you will men, we first conducted a great airplane pilot studies in order to compile a listing of modern gender subgroups from inside the Norwegian neighborhood.

Pilot Data

Users (Letter = 60) were reached in public in the city heart of Bergen, Norway, and you can requested to engage in a preliminary questionnaire on the hence organizations they experience that women and males from inside the society is split into. One of many members, fifty.0% was indeed lady. A great forty eight.3% have been guys (that participant don’t answer fully the question from the gender/gender 2 ) and imply many years try (SD = , variety 18–79). Almost all (ninety.0%) didn’t have a keen immigrant record. The remainder got often immigrated on their own (6.7%) or was indeed Norwegian born to at least one or a couple immigrant parents (1.7%). You to definitely participant failed to answer the back ground matter.

The fresh new classes towards members is because: ‘There are numerous “types” of women in the modern community. Excite take note of as many different types of lady (age.grams., moms and dads out of small children, businesswomen) as you possibly can consider.’ The rest of the webpage is remaining blank toward fellow member to write on. Toward a different webpage, a comparable knowledge writing on version of boys try showed. The order out of presentation try counterbalanced in order for 1 / 2 of the players detailed girls earliest, the other 1 / 2 of detailed males first.

Typically, the participants indexed 7.twenty-eight different types of females (SD = 4.07, diversity 0–21) and you can 7.42 different types of people (SD = 4.47, diversity 0–24). About three standards was basically employed to decide which groups would be selected since the stimulus communities in the primary study: (a) the team must be mentioned by at the very least four professionals, (b) i desired to possess teams from more societal roles and you will groups (elizabeth.grams., teams discussed from the relatives and you will professional roles and intimate orientations), and you can (c) i planned to make certain we had synchronous men and women subgroups (elizabeth.g., men political figures and you can girls political figures, solitary parents, and single dads) so you’re able to helps contrasting of men and women consuming an identical personal part and class. The selection that a communities is said of the four members is advised of the past authored performs (age.grams., Lee and you can Fiske, 2006; Dentro de mais aussi al., 2013) however, was also pragmatic in the same way that a stricter standard perform limit the number of organizations included and you may a more easy you would involve a lot of communities become rated.

Considering these criteria, 19 men subgroups (company guys, dads away from little ones, police- and you may firemen, bachelors, steeped males, works men, smooth guys, men college students, outdoorsy men, unmarried dads, handy boys, solitary men, male leadership, old boys, gay males, male academics, stylish men, male people in politics, and rockers) and twenty two subgroups of females (single parents, females people in have a glance at this web-site politics, community people, mothers of young kids, nurses, feminists, females pupils, outdoorsy girls, instructors (the feminine sort of the word for the Norwegian was applied), lesbians, dated girls, blog writers, solitary ladies, immigrant lady, macho people, ladies, people artists, exercise women, females teachers, styles females, housewives, and girls leaders) was indeed chosen.

Opting for organizations simply based on the salience throughout the pilot decide to try is not in the place of threats. Once the Fiske ainsi que al. (2002) revealed, each other organizations eliciting antipathy and also in-groups may be less likely to are available. I recognize that the list of teams is bound in lot of ways: Like, record will not consist of the full list of sexual orientations (elizabeth.g., bisexual women or men is omitted, heterosexuality was not said on the pilot and you can presumably pulled to possess granted), and you can “immigrants” were utilized in place of indicating particular ethnicities or places out-of resource. We are really not indicating that our listing is actually associate of your subgroups that ladies and males could possibly get end up in. However, the communities picked try outstanding on Norwegian context, and many of your provided gender subgroups was recognized during the earlier research in other federal contexts (Athenstaedt mais aussi al., 2008).